Recent News
Recent Posts
randomness by Lithium
[March 05, 2025, 01:40:53 pm]
Fifth Matrix Film Announced! by Lithium
[January 29, 2025, 03:37:07 pm]
Holiday Fun by Jeyk
[January 03, 2025, 11:41:50 am]
FA in DC? by Subb
[November 01, 2024, 03:55:27 pm]
Meta Connect 2024 by Tbone
[September 25, 2024, 01:37:22 pm]
2024: New PC for VR! by Tbone
[April 06, 2024, 12:22:30 pm]
MOVED: Fifth Matrix Film Announced! by Tbone
[April 06, 2024, 12:18:27 pm]
Quest 2 Link Best Settings (Finally Better Than Rift S) by Tbone
[November 27, 2023, 04:57:46 pm]
|
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - zer0kill
Pages: [1]
1
« on: June 07, 2011, 06:20:59 pm »
Was able to solo baron with my fighter vs AD heavy team build on Garen. One thing I'll have to remember is even the in game stats page don't take into account things like Garen's passive for his hp regen per 5, Black Cleaver stacks (so Garen effectively ignores 96 armor, not 51) and things like Abyssal Scepter and Amumu's passive (so he ignores 64 magic resist, not 9). But I digress to much, enjoy!
What was your build for this game?
2
« on: April 17, 2011, 01:20:05 am »
It pains me that I am first experienced enough with mindless calculations to know it is supposed to be 288, and second enough of a computer scientist to scoff at the person who failed to program whatever calculator got 2. Actually, as I wrote that, I think its impossible for a calculator to work correctly and have that error in there. So the pictures are falsified, either by modifying setting or cheating to make it look like they failed. : (
Its not impossible, nor did the programmer failed. The 85's take implied multiplication over brackets. Some designer decided that 2(A) should be super important, and thus is take it be first.
Why would you ever do that? Who thought that was a good idea >.<
3
« on: April 17, 2011, 12:10:21 am »
It pains me that I am first experienced enough with mindless calculations to know it is supposed to be 288, and second enough of a computer scientist to scoff at the person who failed to program whatever calculator got 2. Actually, as I wrote that, I think its impossible for a calculator to work correctly and have that error in there. So the pictures are falsified, either by modifying setting or cheating to make it look like they failed. : (
4
« on: April 05, 2011, 03:41:04 pm »
Most excellent! What software do you use?
5
« on: April 05, 2011, 03:30:37 pm »
Thanks guys! I'm looking forward to this.
Pages: [1]
|
Discord
Who's Online
|
Show Posts
April Fools
Guests: 145
Hidden: 0
Users: 0
